Dear Editor,

So, in a period of great austerity, with cuts all around us in local government, Ross-on-Wye town council proposes to spend £2,000 of other people’s money on new furniture to make themselves more comfortable.

As the full council meets only once a month for two to three hours, this seems a reckless waste especially as the new furniture might only have a life of some ten years.

The current 19th century seat furniture was in acceptable condition when I was a councillor some eight years ago. It is unlikely to have deteriorated to such as extent as to necessitate its replacement unless it has been misused by a succession of vandals.

,br>I also question the valuation. The set was valued some twelve years ago at a substantial figure and rate payers will have paid insurance for some time. Obviously, 19th century furniture, being less fashionable, has dropped in financial value but, to this extent? Matching chairs for twelve people or more are known in the antiques trade as ‘long sets’ and carry a group value much higher than their single price. If the council insists on selling these heritage pieces then, at least sell the complete set to achieve a good realisation.

Fortunately, there are people and organisations with an appreciation of the craftsmanship of the past keen to give gravitas to board rooms or the dining rooms of very large houses. The chairs might even sell to another council with representatives who appreciate the dignity that furniture that has stood the test of time imparts. As everyone knows, the re-use of old furniture is also the most environmentally friendly action.

Constance Edwards,

Ross-on-Wye